Professional Whey | Australia’s Supplement Specialists for Whey Protein Powder & Sports Nutrition at Wholesale Prices My Account  Cart Contents  Checkout  
  Home » Catalog My Account  |  Cart Contents  |  Checkout   
  • 15Jan

    Which Whey Do You Go?

    As the owner of the Australian sports supplement company Professional Whey, a common question I get asked is “What is the difference between whey protein concentrate and whey protein isolate?”

    A Little Whey Background

    Because whey protein powder has the highest biological value compared to other protein powder, it has made it the most popular and most recommended protein powder in the supplement market today. This is generally because of two main reasons

    • Whey protein has the highest natural source of branched chain amino acids which stimulates muscle protein synthesis
    • Whey protein has the highest content of the amino acid cystine/cysteine, which is important for the biosynthesis of glutathione; a tripeptide which is one of the most important antioxidants, anti-carcinogenics and immune boosting properties in the body.[1] It is even being reported to fight against HIV.[2]

    Today most whey protein powders are usually either whey protein concentrate (WPC) or whey protein isolate (WPI). Do you know how they differ?

    Is it in the Cost?

    Well yes and no! Comparing the two, whey protein isolate’s are more expensive than whey protein concentrate’s because most whey protein isolate’s have less than 1g of fat and 1g of lactose and a higher quantity of protein; approximately 90%. While most good whey protein concentrate’s contain around 80% protein. With whey protein isolate having a higher concentration of protein, the misconception is that it is the obvious choice over whey protein concentrate. And it’s more expensive, “therefore it must be better” is the common thought! Well just because whey protein isolate costs more, is marketed more than whey protein concentrate and has more protein, it does not guarantee that it is the best.

    It is Actually in the Filtration Process

    Whey protein isolate comes from a longer and more complicated and stringent filtering process. Whey protein concentrate goes through an ultra-filtration process, where the membranes of the filters are about one micrometer, which is amazingly small. To make the isolate, you take the ultra-filtrated concentrate and you filter it again through micro-filtration, where these filters are 4 times smaller than the ultra-filters.

    A Side Note on Isolate Processing

    There is also ion-exchange, which is another (however decreasing) method only ever used to make whey protein isolate. Now the difference between the filtration method and ion-exchange is that with the filtration methods there is:

    · minimal denaturing of the proteins and their biologically-active sub-fractions

    · separation of the protein without the use of heat or chemicals

    · less damage occurs to the immune boosting protein components

    However the ion-exchange process gives the highest levels of protein and lowest levels of fat, lactose and minerals (also called ash) as the process is extraordinarily good at removing nearly everything but the protein. However removing everything bar the protein comes at cost; many healthy components of the whey protein are lost due to heat and chemical process, making it less and less, a whole food. Therefore filtration seems to be producing a more wholesome higher quality protein powder.

    …Moving On

     As whey protein concentrate does not go through such a stringent double filtering process it contains 5-7% milk fat.[3] This fat originates in the milk and is more commonly referred to as butter fat and can be seen rising to the top of the milk bottle in non-homogenised milk. This butter fat contains anabolic growth factors which are not normally found in whey protein isolate.[4] The butter fat also contains much higher levels of various phospho-lipids, of which some are bio-active and include Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA). So even though the butter fat looks like it’s just full of saturated fats, think again; it’s actually natures very own EFA mix!

     

    Also as the WPC processing is less stringent; its lactose is much higher (containing around 5%). The lactose contains oligosaccharides that act as growth factors, toxin-binding factors,

    anti-microbial peptides, prebiotics, and immune regulatory factors.[5] The Lactose also has a relatively low glycemic index and is a precursor for other bioactives such as lactulose and lactobionic acid.[6] These form minerals and antioxidants.[7]

     

    However the main disadvantage of WPC is because of the higher level of lactose and fat, this means more calories. So if you are on extremely strict diet and are careful of every calorie that you consume i.e bodybuilder or athlete before competition; then WPC may not be your choice of whey protein powder. Also the same goes if you are lactose intolerant, WPI may be a better choice.[8] And if you feel you don’t actually need the larger amount of growth factors or the health benefits then WPI may be a better choice.


     

    Finally

     

     

     

    Whey protein powder actually consists of several different proteins; they are beta-lactoglobulin, glycomacropeptide, alpha-lactalbumin, immunoglobulins, proteose-peptone, bovine serum albumin and minor peptides such as lactoferrin, lysozyme, lactoperoxidase and beta casein.[9] Some of these will become more popular individually over the next 20 years as technology improves and pricing lowers. At present Japan imports 80% off the total global market of lactoferrin per year. 14% goes to Korea.[10] I think these countries are on to something!!

     

    Generally, WPC contains more lactoferrin than WPI. Lactoferrin helps the intestines fight against bacteria that cause infections and food poisoning due to its anti bacterial activity.[11] The amount of health-promoting immunoglobulins in WPC is generally double that of WPI. Thus, from both growth stimulating and a health view point WPC looks to be a better choice.

     

    Therefore don’t be influenced by companies who have an agenda (called profits) when promoting WPI, as a good WPC is not inferior to a good WPI. In fact in many cases it’s probably a superior choice of protein powder.


     

    Things to Look Out For

     

    When buying a good WPC make sure the labeling does not say “Whey Concentrate Blend”, as this usually indicates a blending of good 80% WPC with a lesser quality WPC below 80% i.e WPC 30, WPC 50 or WPC 75, as a way to reduce costs by the manufacturer. The same goes for WPI, avoid blended WPI’s. Unfortunately companies don’t write whether their WPC is 50, 75 or 80%, but the nutritional profile will speak the truth. To know if you have a whey protein powder make sure your WPC is around 80g per 100g and your WPI is 90g per 100g.


     

    Conclusion

     

     

     

    As a company who sells both WPI and WPC we make profits from selling both and have similar profit margins from both. We have no profit driven agenda by writing this article. It is written to educate and answer the question “what is the difference between WPI and WPC?”

    I personally go with WPC once or twice per day to consume more of the growth and health stimulating properties. However I forgo these properties to consume WPI in my post workout shake as it is a slightly faster acting protein and has lower fat and lactose levels.

    So whatever whey you go, you are now more informed to make a whey better decision…

    Keep Living Strong

    Copyright © by Professional Whey


    [1] A. H. Varnam, Jane P. Sutherland, Milk and Milk Products: Technology, Chemistry and Microbiology, Chapman & Hall, 2001, pp.159-180.

    [2] National Dairy Council, Emerging Health Benefits of Whey,
    http://www.nationaldairycouncil.org/NationalDairyCouncil/Health/Digest/dcd74-6Page4.htm, 2003.

    [3] Dr. R H Archer, Whey Products, Protein & Powder Technology Section, New Zealand Dairy

    Research Institute, http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/dairy/3G.pdf.

    [4] Will Brink, The Whey It Is, 2003, http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink3.htm

    [5] Walzem, R.L., C.J. Dillard, and J.B. German, Whey Components, Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. July 2002; 42(4):353-75.

    [6] U.S. Dairy Export Council, Reference Manual for U.S. Whey And Lactose Products , Arlington, U.S. Dairy Export Council, 2003. www.usdec.org/publications/ PubDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=587

    [8] Judy A. Driskell (Ed), Sports Nutrition: Fats and Proteins, CRC Press, 2007, p.146.


    [9] A. H. Varnam, Jane P. Sutherland, Milk and Milk Products: Technology, Chemistry and Microbiology, Chapman & Hall, 2001, pp.159-180.

    [10] Ap-foodtechnology.com, Fonterra taps into Asia’s appetite for lactoferrin, http://www.ap-foodtechnology.com/Processing/Fonterra-taps-into-Asia-s-appetite-for-lactoferrin, 2004.

    [11] Shawn M. Talbott, A Guide to Understanding Dietary Supplements: Magic Bullets Or Modern Snake Oil? Haworth Press, 2002, pp.167-169.


    Share/Save/Bookmark

7 Responses

WP_Lime_Slice
  • Vaughn Says:

    The web is full of articles on whey protein, but this has been the most informative article I’ve read. I’ve been asking the question above for months and found web articles vague on the issue – besides saying WPC has more fat. Hmmm I wonder if they had an agenda?
    I’m working through a bag of professional whey WPC at the moment and love it. The taste appeals to me just the way it is and it works just as well as the ON brand I was using previously. Thanks for your honesty and the helpful info!

  • James Says:

    this has helped clear many an issue i was wrestling with when other pages had ‘just because’ as their reasoning. i like to know the why behind things. The only other arctile i found better than this was writen by a body building freak, freak in that he was doing a PHd in bio-medicdal science. And this was a close second.

  • Steve Says:

    I agree this was a very insightful article around the differences and it clearly laid out the differences rather than just WPI has more protein – that I can work out from the label.
    I was bouncing between the two and now after reading the article have decided to go with WPC. To me it seemed to have more general health benefits whilst still being a great source of the extra protein.

    Although I do like the idea of using both WPC and WPI in combination, will give just the WPC a go for a while then maybe move into using both once I have done a good couple of months with WPC.

  • David Says:

    A very informative article that spells out the benefits of each. I have been using WPI for a while now but am making the switch to WPC due to the increased health benefits discussed.

    I was wondering however, what the comparison would be between WPI, WPC and Micellar Casien protein and what benefits/differences Micellar Casien has that the others may not.

    Thanks for the helpful info and i will be sure to kepp reading the blogs for more useful information!

  • Mark Martinez Says:

    Very informative article. I always had a doubt about which method deteriorates the biological value of protein more… and then you mention it: “separation of the protein without the use of heat or chemicals” so filteration methods tend to be better.
    Mark Martinez

  • Brett Says:

    A good article with references noted. I have a question though. I have read that many companies try and pass of denatured (and lower quality whey) protein under the description of “low temperature” processing, as opposed to “cold processed” (and trully undenatured) varieties. Is there a quantifiable difference between WPI varieties that are cold processed, as opposed to subject to low-temperature processing. If we are told that temperatures denature protein, are we right to believe that cold-processing is superior? Can the “low temeperature” processing of the NZ WPI for sale on this site be quantified or further explained.

    Looking forward to more information about the Hyrdolyzsed WPI recently listed on professionalwhey.com.au.

  • Stephen Morris Says:

    Great Question Brett. I am glad you asked it.

    It comes down to language used and allowed in the USA and language used and allowed in Australia.

    In Australia regulations are a lot stricter and therefore there is very little license to blur the facts, when it comes to whey protein, (and rightly so) however in America this is not the case the facts are blurred constantly.

    Therefore be aware that what is “cold pressed” in America is what we understand to be “low temperature” in Australia, and therefore our NZ WPI is just as superior as any “cold pressed” whey protein.

    Living Strong
    Stephen

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.